Successful repair of recurrent ventricular septal perforation after myocardial infarction using double patch technique via right ventriculotomy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal perforation (VSP) is a rare but life-threatening complication. Surgical repair is challenging and carries significant risks, particularly in the context of recurrent VSPs. This case study presents a patient with recurrent VSP after initial surgical repair following myocardial infarction. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old male were re-administered to our hospital due to recurrent VSP. He was during follow up after undergone emergency VSP closure surgery 2 months earlier, utilizing the bovine double patch technique via left ventriculostomy. The initial VSP was located in the apical part of the interventricular septum, while the recurrent VSP appeared in the upper middle portion of the interventricular septum (Fig. 1). As the previous patch remained intact, the second surgery employed the bovine double patch technique via right ventriculostomy. The patient's condition remained stable without the development of heart failure symptoms. CONCLUSION: Repairing recurrent VSPs remains a challenge, necessitating the mastery of appropriate approaches to achieve optimal outcomes. Further research and guidelines are required to refine management strategies for recurrent VSPs.

[Giant Left Ventricular Aneurysm After Double Patch Closure of Ventricular Septal Perforation Through Right Ventriculotomy].

A 66-year-old man. He had myocardial infarction due to occlusion of the left anterior descending branch, which was subsequently complicated by ventricular septal perforation. Ventricular septal perforation was repaired through right ventricle incision, applying double patches for closure, and injecting glue between the patches. The early postoperative course was good, but the infarcted left ventricular anterior wall remained because of the right ventriculotomy approach. A left ventricular aneurysm was demonstrated on postoperative follow-up echocardiography, which gradually enlarged to become giant. Since symptoms of heart failure such as respiratory distress appeared, left ventriculoplasty was performed 29 months after the perforation of the initial surgery. Since thinned left ventricular wall remains following right ventriculotomy approach, risk of postoperative left ventricular aneurysm should be taken into account.

Multicentre short- and medium-term report on the device closure of a post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture - In search of risk factors for early mortality.

BACKGROUND: Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare and severe complication of myocardial infarction. To find early mortality (<30 days) risk factors of device VSR closure and to evaluate its medium-term outcome. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective analysis on all 46 consecutive patients with percutaneous (n = 43) or hybrid (n = 3) VSR closure in 2000-2020 with various nitinol wire mesh occluders. Medical records, hemodynamic data, procedure results, short- and mid-term follow-up were analyzed (4.8 ± 3.7 years, range: 0.1-15, available in 61.7% of patients). Of the patients, 34.8% underwent VSR closure in acute phase (<21 days after VSR occurrence), 17.4% underwent device closure due to significant residual shunt after previous VSR surgery. RESULTS: Success rate was 78.3%. More than moderate residual shunt, major complications, and early surgical reintervention affected 18.9%, 15.2% (including 2 intra-procedural deaths), and 21.7% of patients, respectively. Early mortality was 26.1% (13.9% in successful vs. 70% in unsuccessful closure; p < 0.001). Older age, need for intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, severe complications, and procedural failure were identified as risk factors for early mortality. Among patients who survived the early period, the 5-year survival rate was 57.1%. NYHA class improved in 88.2% patients at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure of VSR device closure demonstrates an acceptable technical success rate; however, the incidence of severe complications and early mortality is notably high. Older patients in poor hemodynamic condition and those with unsuccessful occluder deployment are particularly at a higher risk of a fatal outcome. The prognosis after early survival is promising.

ST-Elevation myocardial infarction patient with ventricular septal rupture complication: A Case Report.

Abstract: Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is an uncommon but very significant mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with typically severe hemodynamic effects. Until surgical closure of the defect and revascularization of the coronary bypass surgery graft (CABG), the patient at Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital with VSR reports sequelae of MI with stable hemodynamic condition.

Intra-aortic balloon pump still has a role in late-onset myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular septal rupture with intractable heart failure: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The current guidelines have discouraged the routine use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Since then, the trend of IABP utilization in ACS has been declining. Nevertheless, the guidelines still preserve the recommendation of IABP use in hemodynamic instability or cardiogenic shock caused by post myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal rupture (VSR). CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-years-old diabetic Southeast Asian female was referred from a peripheral facility with intractable heart failure despite treatment with vasoactive agents and diuretics for five days. The ECG suggested a recent anteroseptal myocardial infarction with normal high-sensitivity troponin-I value. The echocardiography detected a regional wall motion abnormality and a 10 mm wide ventricular septal defect. Invasive coronary angiography revealed a severe two-vessel coronary artery disease. We planned a delayed surgical strategy with preoperative optimization using IABP as a bridge to surgery. IABP implantation followed by significant hemodynamic improvement and rapid resolution of heart failure without any inotrope support. Afterwards, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and VSR surgical repair were performed. We safely removed IABP on the third postoperative day with proper weaning and minimal vasoactive support. CONCLUSION: We report a case where IABP still provided benefits for a patient with intractable heart failure caused by undetermined onset MI complicated by VSR. The use of IABP in such a case is in accordance with the recommendation of the current guidelines. Several studies showed that IABP use during preoperative optimization in the case of post-MI VSR was associated with survival benefits.

The left ventricular "lining" technique for repair of ischemic ventricular septal rupture.

We describe a technique to repair ischemic ventricular septal rupture via a left ventriculotomy. It employs a large endoventricular patch as a "lining" over the locally patched septal defect and the free wall defect which is going to be roofed with an external patch. Both defects are then closed in double layers, holding a single continuous patch. The technique enhances the advantage of the left ventriculotomy in the repair and minimizes ventriculotomy-related morbidity.

Delayed Giant Pseudoaneurysm With Left-to-Right Shunt Following Postinfarct Ventricular Septal Perforation Repair.

Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm with a left-to-right shunt is extremely rare, requiring surgery if symptomatic; however, surgery has a high risk. Here, the case of a 77-year-old man with heart failure symptoms is reported, in which he develops a giant left ventricular pseudoaneurysm 16 months after ventricular septal perforation repair as a result of acute myocardial infarction, with mild shunt blood flow from the pseudoaneurysm to the right ventricle. Intraoperative findings showed a free wall rupture along the area where the patch was secured during the initial surgery. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 13, and postoperative examination revealed no abnormalities.

Long-Term Results and Risk Factors of Treatment for Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) following myocardial infarction (MI) is a rare but lethal complication. We analyzed the long-term results and risk factors for survival in the treatment of VSR. METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2021, 115 consecutive patients with post-MI VSR were admitted to our hospital. Depending on different treatment methods patients were divided into following three groups: medical, transcatheter intervention, and surgical repair. During the study, relevant clinical data, operation-related conditions, and follow-up data were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to determine the cumulative incidence of mortality. The independent risk factors for patient mortality were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 43.4 ± 34.7 months. The overall in-hospital, 30-day, and long-term mortality rates were 24.3%, 38.3%, and 51.3%, respectively. In the medical group, the in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 46.7 % (21/45) and 82.2 % (37/45), respectively, with only three patients alive at follow-up. In the transcatheter intervention group, 30-day and long-term mortality rates were 12% and 28%, respectively. In the surgical repair group, 30-day and long-term mortality rates were 8.9% and 22.2%, respectively. Compared with the surgery-group patients, patients with transcatheter intervention had a longer time from VSR to intervention. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age, previous infarction, Killip class, serum creatinine, Troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and medical strategy were risk factors for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day and long-term outcomes of patients treated with surgical repair and transcatheter intervention were significantly better than medically treated patients.

Advent of severe mitral regurgitation in surgical ventricular restoration and ventricular septal rupture repair.

BACKGROUND: Per-procedural severe mitral regurgitation is a rare complication in concomitant surgical ventricular restoration and postinfarction ventricular septal rupture repair. It is challenging to discover the underlying etiology and adopt an appropriate strategy, in particular, in a high-risk patient. CASE PRESENTATION: Semi-emergent surgical ventricular restoration combined with ventricular septal rupture closure and coronary artery bypassing was performed in a 67-year-old male patient. Severe mitral regurgitation was detected after the weaning of cardiopulmonary bypass. Two key questions arose in the management of this condition: did the regurgitation exist previously and was dissimulated by significant left-to-right shunt, or it occurred secondarily to the Dor procedure? Which was the better management strategy, chordal-sparing mitral valve replacement or mitral plasty? We believed that severe mitral regurgitation was under-estimated pre-operatively and we performed an downsizing annuloplasty to treat mitral regurgitation. The outcomes were promising and the patient did well in follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our case brought out an open discussion on the etiology and therapeutic strategies of this complicated condition.

[Semi-acute Surgery for Ventricular Septal Perforation After Unsuccessful Intra-aortic Balloon Pumping Support:Report of a Case].

Ventricular septal perforation( VSP) after acute myocardial infarction( MI) is a serious condition that requires surgical treatment. However, good outcome is not always obtained. The mortality rate of VSP is particularly high in cases whom emergency surgery is performed early in the course of the disease, and the timing of surgery is known to affect prognosis. In this case report, the patient assisted with intra-aortic balloon pump. VSP closure surgery (a modified David-Komeda technique) underwent 8 days after MI onset. Except for mild residual shunt, the patient experienced no adverse event during postoperative course and was discharged 30 days after the surgery. This case illustrated timing of surgery as well as adequate mechanical cardiopulmonary assistance and surgical technique is important.

Percutaneous Closure vs. Surgical Repair for Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Ventricular septal rupture is an important high-mortality complication in the scope of myocardial infarctions. The effectiveness of different treatment modalities is still controversial. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy of percutaneous closure vs. surgical repair for the treatment of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture (PI-VSR). METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed on relevant studies found through PubMed®, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (or CNKI), Wanfang Data, and VIP databases searching. The primary outcome was a comparison of in-hospital mortality between the two treatments, and the secondary outcome was documentation of one-year mortality, postoperative residual shunts, and postoperative cardiac function. Differences were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the relationships between predefined surgical variables and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Qualified studies (742 patients from 12 trials) were found and investigated for this meta-analysis (459 patients in the surgical repair group, 283 patients in the percutaneous closure group). When comparing surgical repair to percutaneous closure, it was found that the former significantly reduced in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.96, P=0.03) and postoperative residual shunts (OR: 0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.10, P<0.00001). Surgical repair also improved postoperative cardiac function overall (OR: 3.89, 95% CI 1.10-13.74, P=0.04). However, there was no statistically significant difference in one-year mortality between the two surgical strategies (OR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.24-1.39, P=0.23). CONCLUSION: We found that surgical repair appears to be a more effective therapeutic option than percutaneous closure for PI-VSR.

Early and Late Surgical Outcomes after Geometrical Infarct Exclusion for Post-Infarct Ventricular Septal Perforation.

PURPOSE: Ventricular septal perforation (VSP) is a critical complication of acute myocardial infarction. Various surgical procedures for it have been developed; however, surgical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. In 2010, we introduced geometrical infarct exclusion (GIE) as a modification of the Komeda-David technique. This retrospective study compared the surgical outcomes of our geometric infarct exclusion technique to those of other surgical procedures. METHODS: This study included 38 patients who underwent surgery for VSP. They were divided into patients who underwent GIE (GIE group; n = 17) and those who underwent other procedures (non-GIE group; n = 21). The clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Operation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cardiac arrest times in the GIE group were significantly longer than those in the non-GIE group (p <0.001). A residual shunt was observed in one patient (5.8%) in the GIE group and eight (38.0%) in the non-GIE group (p = 0.026). No patients in the GIE group required a reoperation for the residual shut, while two patients required it in the non-GIE group (p = 0.492). Operative mortality was insignificantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Geometric infarct exclusion has a longer procedural time than does other surgical procedures but can reduce the rates of residual shunts and reoperations.

Delayed Ventricular Septal Rupture Repair After Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Review.

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but serious complication that can occur after myocardial infarction (MI) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The optimal management approach for VSR remains a topic of debate, with considerations including early versus delayed surgery, risk stratification, pharmacological interventions, minimally invasive techniques, and tissue engineering. The pathophysiology of VSR involves myocardial necrosis, inflammatory response, and enzymatic degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM), particularly mediated by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). These processes lead to structural weakening and subsequent rupture of the ventricular septum. Hemodynamically, VSR results in left-to-right shunting, increased pulmonary blood flow, and potentially hemodynamic instability. The early surgical repair offers the advantages of immediate closure of the defect, prevention of complications, and potentially improved outcomes. However, it is associated with higher surgical risk and limited myocardial recovery potential during the waiting period. In contrast, delayed surgery allows for a period of myocardial recovery, risk stratification, and optimization of surgical outcomes. However, it carries the risk of ongoing complications and progression of ventricular remodeling. Risk stratification plays a crucial role in determining the optimal timing for surgery and tailoring treatment plans. Various clinical factors, imaging assessments, scoring systems, biomarkers, and hemodynamic parameters aid in risk assessment and guide decision-making. Pharmacological interventions, including vasopressors, diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, antiplatelet agents, and antiarrhythmic drugs, are employed to stabilize hemodynamics, prevent complications, promote myocardial healing, and improve outcomes in VSR patients. Advancements in minimally invasive techniques, such as percutaneous device closure, and tissue engineering hold promise for less invasive interventions and better outcomes. These approaches aim to minimize surgical morbidity, optimize healing, and enhance patient recovery. In conclusion, the management of VSR after MI requires a multidimensional approach that considers various aspects, including risk stratification, surgical timing, pharmacological interventions, minimally invasive techniques, and tissue engineering.

Post-infarction ventricular septal defect surgery in Portugal.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We performed a collective analysis of a dedicated national post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect (VSD) registry to further elucidate controversial areas of this clinical entity's surgical treatment. METHODS: A descriptive statistical analysis was carried out and cumulative survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate logistic regression of risk factors for 30-day mortality are presented. RESULTS: Median survival of the cohort (n=76) was 72 months (95% CI 4-144 months). Better cumulative survival was observed in patients who underwent VSD closure more than 10 days after myocardial infarction (log-rank p=0.036). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), different closure techniques, location of the VSD, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as bridge to closure, or intra-aortic balloon pump as bridge to closure showed no statistically significant differences at Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate binary logistic regression for independent factors affecting status at 30 days showed a statistically significant effect of age (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.01-1.15) and concomitant CABG (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.06-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Our results are comparable with previous reports regarding mortality, risk factors and concomitant procedures. Timing of surgery remains a controversial issue. Later closure seems to be advantageous, however, there is significant observational bias.

[Successful Staged Repair of Double Rupture after Acute Myocardial Infarction:Report of a Case].

Double rupture is a very rare, and life-threatening complication after acute myocardial infection (AMI), which defined as the coexistence of any two of the three types of rupture include left ventricular free wall repture (LVFWR), ventricular septal perforation (VSP) and papillary muscule repture (PMR). We report here a case of successful staged repair of double rupture combined LVFWR and VSP. A 77-year-old woman with diagnosis of AMI in the anteroseptal area fell into cardiogenic shock suddenly just before starting coronary angiography. Echocardiography showed left ventricular free wall rupture, then an emergent operation was performed under intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS) assistance using bovine pericardial patch and felt sandwich technique. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography revealed ventricular septal perforation on the apical anterior wall. Her hemodynamic condition was stable, therefore we selected a staged VSP repair to avoid surgery on freshly infarcted myocardium. Twenty-eight days after the initial operation, VSP repair was performed using the extended sandwich patch technique via right ventricle incision. Postoperative echocardiography revealed no residual shunt.

Surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture: current state of the art.

The incidence of postacute myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture (post-AMI VSR) has decreased over the past two decades. Nevertheless, individuals who suffer from post-AMI VSR continue to represent a subgroup of patients with high morbidity and mortality. The care for these patients is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. However, because of the small number of reports that exist to guide clinical practice, there is a significant variability in care among centers. This review summarizes information on post-AMI VSR diagnosis and outline contemporary best management and practice consideration.

Does extracorporeal life support influence outcome after surgical management of post infarct ventricular septal rupture? A monocenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is an uncommon but life-threatening complication of acute myocardial infarction. Extra corporeal life support (ECLS) use in the preoperative setting allows hemodynamic stabilization for a delayed surgery. We aimed to assess the role of ECLS in the preoperative period of post infarction VSR surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients operated for VSR between January 2007 and August 2019. We assessed baseline characteristics, pre and post-operative clinical status and the use of ECLS in the peri-operative period. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were included. Mean age was 69.8 years. In-hospital mortality was 48.7%. Survivors and non-survivor patients had similar characteristics except for lower postoperative ejection fraction (32% vs. 42%, P=0.02) and more acute renal failure (71.4% vs. 10%, P=0.0005) in the non-survivor group. Patients who received ECLS preoperatively were younger (72 vs. 65, P=0.02) and had more preoperative invasive ventilation (16% vs. 50%, P=0.04). Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB, 140 min vs. 75 min, P=0.0008) and cross clamping times (94 min vs. 52 min, P=0.0026) were significantly higher in the ECLS group. There were more bleeding complications in the ECMO group (45.4% vs. 0%, P=0.0019) and more need for reintervention (63.3% vs. 13%, P=0.015). There was no difference in mortality between the two groups. There was no difference in postoperative characteristics between urgent and delayed surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, post-operative ECLS use was associated with more bleeding complications and need for reintervention. Although mortality was similar, bleeding complications remain a major limitation for the systematic use of ECLS in the post-operative period.

Protocol-based Surgical Intervention to Manage Ventricular Septal Rupture from a Tier Two City.

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzes the outcome of a protocol-based surgical approach for ventricular septal rupture (VSR). The study also clarifies the appropriate time for intervention. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of all VSR cases evaluated between February 2006 and March 2020. Cases were managed using the same protocol. Patients were divided into two cohorts - early (those in whom our protocol was instituted within 24 hours of diagnosis) and delayed (intervention between 24 hours and seven days after diagnosis). All-cause mortality was considered as the outcome. RESULTS: The mean age of presentation was 60.1 years, and 75.9% of the patients were men. Cardiogenic shock was the most common mode of presentation. Our analysis validates that once a patient develops VSR, age, sex, comorbidities, left ventricular function, and renal failure at the time of presentation do not have a statistically significant impact on the outcome. The sole factor to have an impact on the outcome was time of intervention. All patients in the delayed cohort expired after surgery, which dragged the overall mortality to 34.5%, whereas 95% of patients in the early cohort are still on follow-up. The mortality in this group was 5% (P≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Early surgical intervention has proven benefits over delayed approach. Surgical intervention in the early part of the disease reduces the risk and thus improves the outcome. The extreme rarity makes VSR an uncommon entity among surgeons. A protocol-based approach makes the team adapt to this unfamiliar situation better.

Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of Post-Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.

Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture is the most catastrophic mechanical complication with high morbidity and mortality, reaching 94% in patients treated conservatively and 47% in patients undergoing cardiac surgery procedures (30-day mortality). In this review article we tried to review trans-catheter closure approach and explain elaborately device selection based on real-world patients in this fatal complication.